Gate the exception
Routine work should not ask for approval simply because AI touched it. Stop where value, risk, sensitivity, or uncertainty crosses a written boundary.
Field note · 7 min read
A generic “approve” button does not create governance. A useful approval gate has a reason for stopping, a named authority, the evidence needed to decide, and a defined outcome when nobody responds.
Discuss your use caseRoutine work should not ask for approval simply because AI touched it. Stop where value, risk, sensitivity, or uncertainty crosses a written boundary.
Reviewers need what changed from the normal path: the discount variance, missing document, late promise, or low-confidence match.
A team, role, and escalation path should own the decision before the first case arrives.
Offer approved outcomes such as accept, reject, request more evidence, or reassign—without letting the agent invent a new policy.
Timeouts and silence should hold or expire the request. They should never turn into execution.
The final record should preserve the decision, reviewer, time, rule version, and supporting evidence.
Start with one decision
We’ll map the systems, facts, rules, and approval point before discussing a pilot.